Select the same two identifiable building points on both plans. The model will rotate and move for coordinated outputs; it will never be rescaled or rewrite either level's walls.
1. Master level — building coordinates
Click reference point A, then B.
2. Level to align — local coordinates
Click the matching reference point A, then B.
3. Coordinated overlay preview
Choose two points on each plan to preview the alignment.
Current project · project — · revision — · envelope explorer
See what each thermal decision changes.
Explore the same building geometry with different envelope specifications. Live results use the fast comparative model; the EnergyPlus report is the higher-fidelity hourly assessment.
Live model
No roof designed yet
We've assumed a 25° pitched roof over the whole floor plan. Your heating figure will change once you design the real roof.
Quick comparative modelUse the live result to compare orientation and specification choices. Absolute demand and the size of any benefit remain indicative.Flagship cross-checkThe live model was higher than EnergyPlus at every tested orientation in the locked flagship case. This conservative result is not yet a universal claim.EnergyPlus & complianceEnergyPlus is the preferred higher-fidelity technical assessment. It remains input-dependent; compliance is determined separately.
Select a saved project before opening the thermal estimator.
Annual space-conditioning demand
—kWh/m²·yr — energy used per square metre of floor, per yearkWh/m²·yr
Heating —Cooling —
Comfort, ventilation, solar admission and input sensitivity affect this result.
What affects this resultOpenable-window cooling is modelled before active cooling. A no-summer-ventilation sensitivity will appear here.Comfort band: 20–24°C. Percentage of occupied hours within the band is not calculated by this monthly model.Gain-sensitivity diagnostic pending.
Estimated annual running cost—EstimateUsing declared defaults of 40¢/kWh and a typical heat pump. SCOP (seasonal coefficient of performance) 3.5 means about 3.5 units of heat for each unit of electricity across the heating season.Complete the running-cost choices to compare this build with a typical NZ code-built house.
Change from last result
Specification changed
Annual demand—Whole building—Running cost—
Same house, compared simply
Compare this design with a typical NZ code-built house using the same geometry.The statutory H1/VM1 basis is shown separately.
H1/VM1 referenceCompliance basis · services held equal · reference zone
—
The bar scale adjusts to the highest result shown. Use the numbers at right for absolute changes.
Reference details
The indicative code-built house uses the same geometry with a code-minimum envelope, assumed 5 ACH50 and no heat recovery.
The H1/VM1 reference holds geometry, airtightness, ventilation, MVHR and services equal; only insulation and glazing change to code minimum.
Extra capital cost—Against the indicative NZ code-built houseComplete upgrade rates in Cost InputsAnnual energy saving—Against a typical NZ code-built houseSimple payback—Indicative; excludes finance and escalationCapital-cost breakdown
Building geometry used
Net external areas come from the current project model.Openings are shown separately and are not double-counted in the opaque wall area.
—
Net external walls—
Opaque wall area after openings
Gross glazed openings—
Windows and glazed openings
External doors—
Opaque external doors
Roof—
Modelled external roof area
Treated floor—
Conditioned floor area
Gross heat loss—
Envelope, junctions and ventilation
Usable free gains—
Solar and internal gains used by the calculation
Net conditioning demand—
Heating plus active cooling after usable gains
Inputs and external check
Every result-driving input carries its value, source and current evidence status.
Fisher validates the monthly method, not this building’s assumptions.
The hourly model has no external validation anchor of its own. The Fisher anchor below validates the monthly method only.